qCMOS camera vs. EM-CCD camera – Performance comparison of photon counting cameras

When providing scientific cameras appropriate for the needs of the customer, a traditional trend was to use ultra-sensitive EM-CCD (electron multiplying CCD) cameras for measurements in a very low light region, and sCMOS (scientific CMOS) cameras with large pixel numbers, high speed, and high dynamic range in relatively bright region. In the meantime, CMOS technology continues to develop particularly in terms of noise characteristics, and we have released a camera equipped with the qCMOS (quantitative CMOS) sensor, a new sensor that marks the dawn of a new era in image sensors.

 

The qCMOS camera is positioned as an ultra-sensitive camera that offers the ultimate in quantitative imaging because of its extremely low noise performance. Therefore, when comparing a qCMOS and EM-CCD camera it is necessary to judge which camera is best suited to your application. The purpose of this article is to compare qCMOS and EM-CCD cameras to help you choose the best camera for your application.

Sensor technologies and photon detection performance

This section describes processes from a signal acquisition to the subsequent digital output in order to compare sensor technologies and the photon detection performances of a qCMOS and EM-CCD camera.

Figure 1 shows the process from the signal acquisition to the digital output in a camera. Photons incident on the sensor are converted to photoelectrons with a probability according to the quantum efficiency of the sensor. The photoelectrons are then converted to voltage and amplified by a floating diffusion amplifier (FDA), and subsequently converted to a digital value by an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) and finally the digital value is output.

In scientific cameras, noise characteristics in this process greatly affect measurements in the very low light region. In particular, it is very important for an ultra-sensitive camera to minimize the readout noise as much as possible in the digital conversion of photoelectron signals.

The process from a signal acquisition to a digital output

Figure 1. The process from a signal acquisition to a digital output

The qCMOS and EM-CCD cameras use different approaches to lower the readout noise to enable detection of signals at the single photoelectron level.

The qCMOS camera uses an ultra-fine CMOS circuit technology to achieve extremely low readout noise (see Whitepaper for details). As shown in Figure 2, when reading out the photoelectron signals of 1, 2, 3, ..., respectively, the qCMOS readout noise is sufficiently lower than the signals to determine the number of photoelectrons precisely from the output result. In this way, the qCMOS camera provides the ultimate in quantitative imaging so that the input photoelectron numbers can be distinguished.

Readout process and photon number resolving in a qCMOS camera

Figure 2. Readout process and photon number resolving in a qCMOS camera

Alternatively, with the EM-CCD camera, although the readout noise itself is very large, the photoelectron signal is increased by an electron multiplication mechanism (as shown in Figure 1.) to relatively reduce the readout noise compared to the signal with gain as shown in Figure 3.

However, because the multiplication process in a detector always produces a large fluctuation in the signal called excess noise, the EM-CCD cannot distinguish the original photoelectron number even if the readout noise is relatively minimized compared to the signal. Therefore, although an EM-CCD camera can detect single-photon level signals with low readout noise by using electron multiplication, quantitative properties are lost due to the excess noise.

Readout process and photon number resolving in an EM-CCD camera

Figure 3. Readout process and photon number resolving in an EM-CCD camera

Table 1 summarizes the feature comparison of qCMOS and EM-CCD cameras described in this section.

  qCMOS camera EM-CCD camera
Readout noise <0.3 electron rms <0.1 electron with EM gain
Electron multiplication Not used Used
Photon detection performance 0, 1, 2, 3, … 0 or more than 1 

Table 1. Feature comparison of a qCMOS and EM-CCD camera

In addition, an example of actual imaging is shown below as a comparison between the qCMOS camera and the EM-CCD camera. 

It can be seen that the qCMOS camera, which does not use electron multiplication, has less image fluctuation from frame to frame compared to the EM-CCD camera, resulting in highly quantitative imaging.

SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) comparison with pixel size consideration

This section compares qCMOS and EM-CCD cameras by the SNR (Signal-to-Noise ratio), which is typically used in quantitative discussions of camera performance.

Figure 4 shows the formula for SNR. (Dark current and clock induced charge (CIC) noise in EM-CCDs are omitted here.)

SNR formula

Figure 4. SNR formula

SNR depends on the amount of incident light to the sensor, so when comparing multiple cameras by incident light level, there are typically two conditions to compare, namely:

  1. when the photon intensity per pixel is equal
  2. when the photon intensity per sensor area is equal

 

Figure 5 shows the SNR comparison of qCMOS (ORCA-Quest), EM-CCD (ImagEM X2), and Gen III sCMOS (ORCA-Fusion BT, previous generations of ORCA-Quest) when the light intensity per pixel is equal, and Figure 6 shows the SNR comparison when the light intensity per sensor area is equal. These graphs show the relative SNR (rSNR), where all data is normalized to an imaginary “perfect camera” that has pixel size of 6.5 µm, zero noise, and 100 % QE.

 

Let’s look at the case of equal light intensity per pixel (Figure 5). This case assumes that the optimum optical system is constructed for the pixel size of each camera. In CMOS cameras, the SNR also decreases as the light intensity decreases because the readout noise is constant regardless of the light intensity. On the other hand, an EM-CCD camera uses multiplication to minimize the readout noise, so the SNR varies little with light level, but the SNR is smaller than that of a CMOS camera in bright region regions due to the constant presence of multiplication fluctuations. Therefore, the traditional trend was that sCMOS cameras are superior in the bright region, while EM-CCD cameras are superior in low light region. However, with the recent development of CMOS technology, qCMOS cameras show SNR comparable to that of EM-CCD cameras in the extremely low light region even at 0.1 photons/pixel/frame.

The SNR comparison when the light intensity is equal per pixel

Figure 5. The SNR comparison when the light intensity is equal per pixel

Next, let’s look at the case of equal light intensity per sensor area (Figure 6). This case assumes that the camera is replaced with the optics unchanged. Since a CMOS camera has a smaller pixel size than the EM-CCD camera and thus the amount of light per pixel is smaller, this comparison includes SNR data of the CMOS cameras with a binning function to input the equivalent amount of light into the pixel unit compared to an EM-CCD.

The SNR comparison when the light intensity is equal per sensor area

Figure 6. The SNR comparison when the light intensity is equal per sensor area

Table 2 shows the comparison conditions and the actual cases that the conditions are suited. 

Due to the architecture of CMOS sensors, when NXN binning is performed the readout noise per binned pixel increases N times larger compared to that of the single pixel. Therefore, when replacing a camera with a larger pixel size with a qCMOS camera, it is recommended to construct an optical system optimized for the pixel size of the qCMOS camera without binning, to maximize its performance for a fair comparison.

Condition Equal light intensity per pixel Equal light intensity per sensor area
Case When an optical system is optimized for the pixel size of the camera When the camera is replaced with the optics unchanged.

Table 2. SNR comparison conditions and the corresponding cases

The versatility of qCMOS camera

When comparing qCMOS cameras with EM-CCD cameras, one of the advantages of qCMOS cameras is the versatility. qCMOS cameras are a hybrid camera that combine the advantages of conventional sCMOS cameras with the extremely low noise equivalent to that of EM-CCDs. The following is a list of applications where qCMOS cameras can be used.

  • Ultra-sensitive imaging with ultimate quantitativeness that enables photon number resolving at a slow frame rate.
  • Highly sensitive imaging at a fast frame rate (Slower frame rate in EM-CCDs)
  • Highly sensitive imaging with high dynamic range (EM-CCD sacrifices dynamic range due to electron multiplication)
  • Wide field of view and high resolution imaging with large pixel numbers
  • Flagship dark current performance among CMOS cameras suited for applications in need of long-time exposure

Dominant areas of an EM-CCD camera

The relative SNR comparison in Figures 5 and 6 shows that the EM-CCD camera outperforms the qCMOS camera in the very low light region below 0.1 photons/pixel/frame. However, the "absolute SNR value" at 0.1 photons/pixel/frame is so small that the sample is almost invisible, buried in the noise. Figure 7 shows an image simulation of a test chart sample (Incident light level: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 10 photons/pixel/frame, Wavelength: 475 nm, Imaging area: 512X512 pixels, Background light: 0, each image autoscaled with respect to itself) using the Camera Simulation Engine from Hamamatsu Photonics. As shown in these images, neither camera can detect most of the sample at 0.1 photons/pixel/frame, so it means the SNR advantage of EM-CCD at this light level is meaningless.

As a more practical simulation, results with a certain percentage of background light relative to the incident light level are attached below for reference.

Reference

Simulation result of test chart sample in low light region

Figure 7. Simulation result of test chart sample in low light region

An EM-CCD camera uses electron multiplication to minimize the readout noise as much as possible, so that there is almost no noise in the dark region when a background light is absent, as shown in Figure 7. However, in a realistic case where a background light is present, the background light is also multiplied, resulting in a noticeable noise in the dark region.

 

For applications in such extremely low-light regions, imaging is generally performed with very long-time exposure to achieve observable SNR such as more than 1 photons/pixel/frame. In this case, EM-CCD cameras still have an advantage over qCMOS cameras for imaging in such extremely low-light regions with very long-time exposure because of the extremely low dark current achieved by cooling performance of the sensor.

 

EM-CCD is a mature sensor technology that is losing its advantage due to the continuous development of CMOS technology. However, it is still necessary to judge whether a qCMOS camera or an EM-CCD camera has a better SNR depending on the light level and exposure times in experiments.

Conclusion

The qCMOS camera is a hybrid camera that combines the advantages of a conventional sCMOS camera with the extreme low noise equivalent to an EM-CCD camera, therefore the qCMOS camera will bring new breakthrough in conventional scientific measurement.

The qCMOS sensor will get even better with the continuous development of CMOS technology. We hope this article will be a starting point for customers to understand the new technology of the qCMOS camera and to select the best detector by comparing its performance among other photon counting detectors such as EM-CCDs.

Contact us for more information.

  • Literature
  • Price
  • Delivery
  • Custom order
  • Demo
  • Support
  • Other

Contact us